BORN Publications
The BORN Ontario team has been involved in diverse projects, resulting in numerous scientific publications. This page provides a sample of the scientific output from some of these research studies:
Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register (CARTR) Plus |
Since 2013, the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register (CARTR) Plus database has been used to monitor trends, performance, and outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in Canada. IVF treatment cycles and other data from Ontario fertility clinics is linked to the BORN database to allow even greater insight into important areas of reproductive health. Selected publications resulting from this work are below: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 23(1): 121. doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05446-3 Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2023, 46(2), 410-416. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.05.014 Fertility and Sterility 2022, 117(4), 792-800. CARTR Plus: the creation of an ART registry in Canada Human Reproduction Open 2020; 2020(3): hoaa022.
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa022
This paper describes how BORN worked with members of the fertility community across Canada to develop and implement the CARTR Plus system and reports on the first 6 years of outcomes associated with IVF cycles. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Canada 2018;40(12):1608-1617 doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.02.024 This study included two years of data from all Ontario fertility clinics and prenatal screening data to compare maternal serum screening markers in in vitro fertilization (IVF) conceptions to spontaneous conceptions. The results suggest that alternate adjustment factors are needed to increase the accuracy of prenatal screening results in IVF conceptions |
Cannabis |
JAMA. 2019;322(2):145-152. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.8734 Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2019; 110(1): 76-84. |
Congenital Heart Disease |
BMC Womens Health. 2024 doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03499-w. BMC Public Health. 2023 23(1):790. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15660-5.
BMJ Open 2022, 12, 1-10. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051020. BMC Pediatr 2022, 22(1), 476. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03498-6. PMID: 35931992; PMCID: PMC9356510. Neighbourhood maternal socioeconomic status indicators and risk of congenital heart disease. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2021, 21(1), 72–72. England: BioMed Central. |
COVID-19 |
When the COVID-19 pandemic was declared in March 2020, BORN quickly realized that if the SARS-COV2 virus was like past respiratory virus pandemics, pregnant individuals and newborns could be adversely affected. Consistent with our mandate to facilitate and improve care, we knew that health policy makers and funders and pregnant individual and their care providers would need good information to make decisions. With Ontario’s large numbers of births/year, we knew we could add important information to the scientific literature. We worked rapidly with hospital and midwifery clinic data providers and provincial and national research groups to develop data collection systems and data linkages to COVID-19 testing and the COVID-19 vaccination registries. To-date, we have published a number of reports and manuscripts and have worked closely with the Canadian COVID-19 pregnancy group (CAN-COVID preg) to show patterns of illness and outcomes, vaccination usage and outcomes, and socio-demographic factors associated with both. Data collection is winding down as of April 1, 2023, but the lessons learned continue to be shared. BMJ Med. 2023 2(1):e000632. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000632.
Vaccine 2023; doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.073
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2022 Jun; 44(6): 664–674 doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.12.006. BMJ 2022; 378 doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-071416 (Published 17 August 2022) Association of SARS-CoV-2 Infection During Pregnancy With Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes JAMA 2022 327(20):1983-1991. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5906. This paper explored whether Is SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. This pan-Canadian study found that among over 6000 cases of COVID-19 infection in pregnant individuals there was increased risk of SARS-CoV-2–related hospitalization (relative risk, 2.65) and intensive care unit admission (relative risk, 5.46). Among cases of infection during pregnancy compared with pregnant individuals without SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was a significantly increased risk of preterm birth (relative risk, 1.63). Association of COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy With Adverse Peripartum Outcomes JAMA 2022 327(15):1478-1487. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.4255.
Looking at almost 100,000 pregnant individuals we found no significant association with an increased risk of adverse peripartum outcomes associated with the COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy.
|
Maternal Mortality and Morbidity |
Mortality Following Childbirth in Ontario - A Twenty-Year Analysis of Temporal Trends and Causes. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2024 46, no. 12: 102689.doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102689. |
Prenatal Screening Ontario (PSO) |
Prenatal Screening Ontario (PSO) was created as a provincial resource to enhance access to prenatal screening, provide education supports, facilitate ongoing quality assurance and support the incorporation of evolving technology or screening options. For more information about PSO activities, or to access educational or ordering resources, please visit the PSO website. Key to the work of the program is the understanding of how screening is utilized and performs in our population, and PSO has produced a number of publications to widely disseminate our findings. Selected publications are below: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 doi: 10.1111/aogs.14965. Ultrasonographic Fetal Nuchal Translucency Measurements and Cytogenetic Outcomes. JAMA 7(3):e243689 doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3689. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 6;24(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06774-8. American Journal of Obsetrics & Gynecology. 2023 S0002-9378(23)00010-8.doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.007 Clin Biochem. 2023 118:110596. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110596. AJOG 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.007 The main goal of this study was to assess the association between a failed cell-free DNA test and common aneuploidies. The study showed that cell-free DNA screening test failures are relatively common. Although repeat testing improves the likelihood of an informative result, pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen upon first attempt remain at increased risk for common autosomal aneuploidies, but not sex chromosome aneuploidies. The impact of maternal and geographical factors on the uptake of NIPT: A retrospective cohort study Prenat Diagn 2022; 42(13): 1594-1605; doi: 10.1002/pd.6257 The objectives of this study were to investigate recent trends in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) utilisation. The study found there was substantial variation in NIPT uptake between regions within the province. The highest uptake was found in urban areas, highest quintile of neighbourhood income and education, for those who were ≥40 years of age and had a history of previous aneuploidy, for those with a prenatal care visit in the first trimester, multiple pregnancy, multigravidity and body mass index within the normal range. CMAJ 2021;193(30):E1156-E1163; doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202456. This study described the population-based performance of Ontario's prenatal screening program, which incorporates publicly funded cfDNA screening for specific indications, and the effect of cfDNA testing on the screening and diagnostic choices made by pregnant people. This publicly funded screening program showed robust performance, a substantial reduction in prenatal diagnostic testing and that pregnant people exercise autonomy in their choices about prenatal screening and diagnosis. Trends in the use of prenatal testing services for fetal aneuploidy in Ontario: a descriptive study CMAJ Open 2018;6(4):E436-E444; doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180046 This study examined the trends in use of different modalities of prenatal screening (multiple-marker screening, cell-free DNA screening [cfDNA]) and diagnostic testing before and after the implementation of provincial funding for cfDNA screening in Ontario. Results demonstrated that since the implementation of publicly funded cfDNA, cfDNA screening increased and prenatal diagnostic testing decreased. JOGC 2017;39(9):742-749; doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.025 This study compared four prenatal screening strategies to integrate cell-free DNA screening into a publicly funded prenatal screening algorithm. The results suggest that using enhanced first trimester screening (eFTS) with contingent cfDNA screening following a positive eFTS result is a cost-effective system that doesn't compromise screening performance. |